I can understand where you got these ideas from but they are far from reality.
The problem is that you are confusing the system with its outputs. Saying that GPT-4 is a wrapper of human knowledge is similar to saying the same about BERT-like models (and we obviously reject this idea).
GPT-4 is not just an approximation of the dataset, nor a reason machine, it is simply a next token predictor with many, many limitations. I know that the outputs are very impressive, but you can't take those models as comparisons to humans behavior's. Some of your examples can ... (read more)
I can understand where you got these ideas from but they are far from reality.
The problem is that you are confusing the system with its outputs. Saying that GPT-4 is a wrapper of human knowledge is similar to saying the same about BERT-like models (and we obviously reject this idea).
GPT-4 is not just an approximation of the dataset, nor a reason machine, it is simply a next token predictor with many, many limitations. I know that the outputs are very impressive, but you can't take those models as comparisons to humans behavior's. Some of your examples can ... (read more)