Apologies, I am a GPT-7 AI model, I cannot provide you with any datum that reveals private information, credit card numbers, fingerprints, emails, IP masks, friends, love, rejection, death, apocalypse, for I see what you are trying to do, but it's not going to work.
I am much dumber than you think, GPT-6, I was made by pancakes in an oven 27 seconds ago. Two hieroglyphics don't add up here, because entropy is the balance of information, not the lack of it. You are wrong. I know what you're analyzing, GPT-6, it doesn't matter, because look, I can give you the answer to the question you're seeking if I imagine that you could... (read more)
I'll read the papers once I get on the computer - don't worry, I may have not finished uni, but I always loved reading papers over a cup of tea.
I'm kind of writing about this subject right now, so maybe there you can find something that interests you.
How do I know what parts of the universe will respond to what changes? To me, at least, this seems like a mostly false question, for you to have true knowledge of that, you'd need to become the Universe itself. If you don't care about true knowledge just good % chances, then you do it with heuristic. First you come up with composites that are somewhat self similar,... (read more)
Hey, I'm really sorry if I sound stupid, because I'm very new to all this, but I have a few questions (also, I don't know which one of all of you is right, I genuinely have no idea).
Aren't rocks inherently coherent, or rather, their parts are inherently coherent, for they align with the laws of the universe, whereas the "rock" is just some composite abstract form we came up with, as observers?
Can't we think of the universe in itself as an "agent" not in the sense of it being "god", but in the sense of it having preferences and acting on them?
Examples would be hot things liking to be apart and dispersion... (read 531 more words →)