This research was completed in context of the LASR Labs Fellowship Summer 2026, by Ardy Haroen, Florian Lorkowski and Samuel Nellessen. The team was mentored by Felix Hostätter. Find out more about the programme and express interest in upcoming cohorts at lasrlabs.org. The full paper is available on arXiv. TL;DR:...
This is a linkpost for https://rewardseeking.ai/ Machine learning models can produce the right outputs for the wrong reasons. Famous examples include a reinforcement learning agent that, rewarded for collecting a coin always placed at the right end of the level, learns to run rightward rather than to seek the coin...
Twitter | Microsite | Apollo Blog | OpenAI Blog | Arxiv Before we observe scheming, where models covertly pursue long-term misaligned goals, models might inconsistently engage in various covert behaviors such as lying, sabotage, or sandbagging. This can happen for goals we give to models or they infer from context,...
Summary * We conducted a small investigation into using SAE features to recover sandbagged capabilities. * We used the Goodfire API to pick out 15 SAE features, 5 related to sandbagging, 5 related to general expertise, and 5 unrelated features. * We used these features to steer a Llama 3.3...
We are releasing a new paper called “The Elicitation Game: Evaluating Capability Elicitation Techniques”. See tweet thread here. TL;DR: We train LLMs to only reveal their capabilities when given a password. We then test methods for eliciting the LLMs capabilities without the password. Fine-tuning works best, few-shot prompting and prefilling...
We have written a paper on sandbagging for which we present the abstract and brief results in this post. See the paper for more details. Tweet thread here. Illustration of sandbagging. Evaluators may regulate the deployment of AI systems with dangerous capabilities, potentially against the interests of the AI system...
Summary: Evaluations provide crucial information to determine the safety of AI systems which might be deployed or (further) developed. These development and deployment decisions have important safety consequences, and therefore they require trustworthy information. One reason why evaluation results might be untrustworthy is sandbagging, which we define as strategic underperformance...