Maybe Gandhi's best option is to "fence off" an area of the slippery slope by establishing a Schelling point - an arbitrary point that takes on special value as a dividing line. If he can hold himself to the precommitment, he can maximize his winnings. For example, original Gandhi could swear a mighty oath to take only five pills - or if he didn't trust even his own legendary virtue, he could give all his most valuable possessions to a friend and tell the friend to destroy them if he took more than five pills. This would commit his future self to stick to the 95% boundary (even though that future self is itching to try to the same precommitment strategy to stick to its own 90% boundary).
makes me think about robert kiyosaki's idea that the more people make the more they spend. They have a "reasonable" budget but as they make more they re-evaluate it for each new level of income, and so the reasonableness grows to a level once unthinkable. (also perhaps like the overton window?).
makes me think about robert kiyosaki's idea that the more people make the more they spend. They have a "reasonable" budget but as they make more they re-evaluate it for each new level of income, and so the reasonableness grows to a level once unthinkable. (also perhaps like the overton window?).