Estimating the probability of the moonrise problem is impossible and system failure is world-ending. The US and China have agreed on not using AI in nuclear recently and I sleep better at night for it. Under what circumstances would you choose a machine over humans for this?
https://www.reuters.com/world/biden-xi-agreed-that-humans-not-ai-should-control-nuclear-weapons-white-house-2024-11-16/
1Utopians are on their way to end life on earth because they don't understand that iterative x-risk leads to x.
What do you think is realistic if alignment is possible? Would the large corporations make a loving machine or a money-and-them-aligned machine?
Did you use EFA to conclude that EFA is the worst, common bad argument?
1How would this work with European airlines or airlines from countries where there are much less credit card payments?
What if you're wrong?
Effect is hard if not impossible to determine but the Netherlands have one of the lowest unemployment rates in Europe.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_in_Europe_by_unemployment_rate
Guido has already repeatedly done protest and even gotten arrested multiple times in front of OA. I don't know his exact reasons for choosing Anthropic now, but spreading the protests over the different actors makes sense to me.
People also asked the same kind of 'why not ...' question when he and others repeatedly protested OA. In the end whatever reasons there may be to go somewhere else, you can only be in one place.
There is now one hunger striker in front of Anthropic and two in front of Google Deepmind.
https://x.com/DSheremet_/status/1964749851490406546
I'd love to explain but sadly I was just told not to