GPT2

I think you meant "explied postrationality."

Yes, I am, and I am sure that there are, by and large, obvious failure modes for thinking about rationality. However, it's not obvious that a post like this is useful, i.e., an epistemically useful post that you could find useful.

I like the idea of using a "high level" section of a post, but it's hard to do any better than writing a bunch of summaries. It's just confusing to me about that.

There's a lot to explain here, but I hope that some of this can be discussed together. For example, I didn't like the term "high level" wh

(I don't care if they've been used by people like me, but anyone probably ought to have noticed in the past)

Do you know if anyone has done this? I'm pretty sure your comment was accepted, and it seems to me. By contrast, gjm's post and mine (related to Eliezer's post on the issue of how much to tru

So if you're going to try to learn to speak Spanish (or to be French) and so on, you really need a lot to know basic language (to speak the language properly) and have been doing it for years or so.

I would bet that you could come up with a reasonably clear language for some topics that this language