Hi, thank you for a really nice and well thought out response. And yeah I was mostly engaging with the rhetorical emphasis of your arguments on this post and not the technical arguments sorry. I'll try to respond to the technical aspect as I understand them with some assistance from Claude to understand some things.
I think I now understand you to be more so taking a position that the general procedures anthropic took in the release of this model would not generalize well to a much more capable model, and so they are not doing their due diligence in apply...
It feels like you are being maximally pessimistic here. I am not an AI expert or an adjacent field by any means, but it seems to me like any statement that could have been interpreted in multiple ways have been interpreted pessimistically.
"To be explicit, the decision not to make this model generally available does not stem from.
Responsible Scaling Policy requirements." -> RSP has failed to gate this release.
The alternative is that anthropic is saying: "We think this model has specific threats which is why we are doing a limited release, but it's danger...
Waiting for drinkhaven