Yeah, my involvement was providing draft feedback on the article and providing some of the images. Looks like my post got taken down for being a duplicate, though
It's a bit of an out-of-body experience to see your own tweet in a newsletter! The location-finding model used is available on geospy.ai.
I agree with most points on a first pass, but I'm still unsure about:
Shouldn't the target for posts be to provide value? If an entirely AI-generated post passes every quality check and appears to be on equal footing to a human post in terms of value, I'd want it. Attribution of credit is a valid concern, but it seems like the solution there is to simply tag the model as the primary author.