ialdabaoth

Affordance Widths

This article was originally a post on my tumblr. I'm in the process of moving most of these kinds of thoughts and discussions here. Okay. There’s a social interaction concept that I’ve tried to convey multiple times in multiple conversations, so I’m going to just go ahead and make a graph. I’m calling this concept “Affordance Widths”. Let’s say there’s some behavior {B} that people can do more of, or less of. And everyone agrees that if you don’t do enough of the behavior, bad thing {X} happens; but if you do too much of the behavior, bad thing {Y} happens. Now, let’s say we have five different people: Adam, Bob, Charles, David, and Edgar. Each of them can do more or less {B}. And once they do too little, {X} happens. But once they do too much, {Y} happens. But where {X} and {Y} starts happening is a little fuzzy, and is different for each of them. Let’s say we can magically graph it, and we get something like this: Now, let’s look at these five men’s experiences. Adam doesn’t understand what the big deal about {B} is. He feels like this is a behavior that people can generally choose how much they do, and yeah if they don’t do the *bare minimum* shit goes all dumb, and if they do a *ridiculous* amount then shit goes dumb a different way, but otherwise do what you want, you know? Bob understands that {B} can be an important behavior, and that there’s a minimum acceptable level of {B} that you need to do to not suffer {X}, and a maximum amount you can get away with before you suffer {Y}. And Bob feels like {X} is probably more important a deal than {Y} is. But generally, he and Adam are going to agree quite a bit about what’s an appropriate amount of {B}ing for people to do. (Bob’s heuristic about how much {B} to do is the thin cyan line.) Charles isn’t so lucky, by comparison. He’s got a *very* narrow band between {X} and {Y}, and he has to constantly monitor his behavior to not fall into either of them. He probably

68May 10, 2018

I notice that I am confused about Identity and Resurrection

66Nov 14, 2013

A Self-Respect Feedback Loop

40May 11, 2018

An Ontology of Systemic Failures: Dragons, Bullshit Mountain, and the Cloud of Doom

32Sep 8, 2018

ialdabaoth

Message

4819

714

13y

An Ontology of Systemic Failures: Dragons, Bullshit Mountain, and the Cloud of Doom

Core Claim I assert that a lot of value can be achieved by categorizing systemic failures into four broad categories. For the sake of pithiness, I will name them "bugs", "dragons", "bullshit mountain", and "the cloud of doom". A Bug is the simplest kind of failure: you have a single...

Sep 8, 201832

A Self-Respect Feedback Loop

This is a followup to Affordance Widths. Epistemic Status: It’s only a model Okay! This is something I’ve been trying to explain for awhile, but I think I have a handy chart for it now. Here’s how it works: A person can actually regulate how much self-respect they feel, and...

May 11, 201840

Affordance Widths

May 10, 201868

Lizard Jockeying for Fun and Profit

If this works, it will serve as a kind of introduction to a series - or sequence, if you will - on social interaction and strategic incorporation of one's emotions into one's reason. But first let's throw this out there and see what happens, shall we? Part the zeroth: a...

Nov 10, 201724

Attending to Now

I live among a community of humans who believe that they need to save the world. They aren't good enough. They may still save the world completely on accident, but ultimately, on the measure, the odds are pretty grim. And they know this. All around me I see people facing...

Nov 8, 201727

RFC on an open problem: how to determine probabilities in the face of social distortion

So, I have a problem that I want help with, but I don't want to focus on the object-level thing except as a particularly sharp example of the abstract problem. Please only throw suggestions here if you have a reasonable understanding of Bayes' rule, *and* grok the problem I'm pointing...

Oct 7, 20176

Meetup : Bay Area Winter Solstice 2016

Discussion article for the meetup : Bay Area Winter Solstice 2016 WHEN: 17 December 2016 07:00:00PM (-0700) WHERE: Anna Head Alumnae Hall, 2537 Haste St, Berkeley, CA 94720 It's time to gather together and remember the true Reasons for the Season: axial tilt, orbital mechanics and other vast-yet-comprehensible forces have...

Sep 22, 20165

Load More (7/15)

LESSWRONG
LW

LESSWRONG
LW

ialdabaoth

ialdabaoth

ialdabaoth

Affordance Widths

I notice that I am confused about Identity and Resurrection

A Self-Respect Feedback Loop

An Ontology of Systemic Failures: Dragons, Bullshit Mountain, and the Cloud of Doom

ialdabaoth

An Ontology of Systemic Failures: Dragons, Bullshit Mountain, and the Cloud of Doom

A Self-Respect Feedback Loop

Affordance Widths

Lizard Jockeying for Fun and Profit

Attending to Now

RFC on an open problem: how to determine probabilities in the face of social distortion

Meetup : Bay Area Winter Solstice 2016

Affordance Widths

I notice that I am confused about Identity and Resurrection

A Self-Respect Feedback Loop

An Ontology of Systemic Failures: Dragons, Bullshit Mountain, and the Cloud of Doom

An Ontology of Systemic Failures: Dragons, Bullshit Mountain, and the Cloud of Doom

A Self-Respect Feedback Loop

Affordance Widths

Lizard Jockeying for Fun and Profit

Attending to Now

RFC on an open problem: how to determine probabilities in the face of social distortion

Meetup : Bay Area Winter Solstice 2016