This write-up was produced as part of the SERI MATS programme under Evan Hubinger’s mentorship. It is also my first post on LW, so feedback is very welcome!
Introduction
This article aims to draw a connection between recent ML research and the claim that future advanced AI systems may be homogenous. First, I briefly review this article, where the idea of homogenous take-off is introduced. Then, I outline two different arguments why you might update in the direction of homogenous take-off. For each of the arguments I mention key uncertainties that I have about the argument itself, as well as broader open questions.
TL; DR
I present two reasons to believe that as models become larger they also become more homogenous, i.e. they behave more similarly to each other:
* Variance between models behaves unimodally in the overparameterised regime: it peaks around the interpolation threshold, then decreases monotonically. Decreased variance means that models make similar predictions across different training runs (captured as variance from initialisation) and different sampling of the training data (variance from sampling);
* Neural networks have a strong simplicity bias even before training, which might mean that multiple training runs with different hyperparameters, initialisation schemes etc. result in essentially the same model.
I’ve somewhat updated in the direction of homogenous take-off as a result of these arguments, though I think that there are still ways in which it’s unclear if e.g. decreasing variance with size rules out heterogeneity.
What’s homogeneous take-off?
There are several axes along which different AI takeoff scenarios could differ: speed, continuity, and number of main actors. Homogeneity vs. heterogeneity in AI takeoff scenarios introduces a new way to look at a potential take-off, through the lens of model homogeneity. Homogeneity intuitively refers to how similar models are at any given time given some definition of similarity. We m