x

Jang-woo Wi

Subscribe

Message

Exploring how actions should be constrained before execution in AI systems.

Some notes here:

https://github.com/Jang-woo-AnnaSoft/execution-boundaries

2

3

7

1mo

Jang-woo Wi

Let's rename the theory of relativity

Let's rename the theory of relativity A misunderstanding of someone's name I think the nature of the theory of relativity is obscured by its name. Usually people are buried in the declaration that 'time and space are relative', but I interpret it completely the opposite way. Paradoxically, time and space must be flexibly transformed in order for fundamental physical laws, such as the law of invariance of energy in the universe, to not go against any circumstances. In the end, time and space change at their own expense in order to preserve the consistency of all the other laws of physics. It's a reversal of perspective beyond just the expression "relative." Einstein started with 'the speed of light is unchanged' and came to the conclusion that for the speed of light to be unchanged, the measurements of time and space must vary depending on the observer. In the end, he first established the axiom that 'the laws of physics should be the same for all inertial systems'. And he came to the conclusion that the measurements of time and space should vary depending on the observer in order to ensure the consistency of the law. What he proved is the 'law invariant theory'. The law is the absolute standard, and time and space are the dependent forms that are adjusted to implement it. So I think "absolute" is more accurate than "relativity" in this theory. In fact, modern physicists also use terms like "Laurant's invariance" or "covariance" and focus more on maintaining the law. So why is light invariant? We often give the textbook explanation that "time slows down because the speed of light is constant," but I want to overturn this cause and effect ontologically. The reason why the speed of light is observed unchanged is that it is the physical limit of freedom that this system of the universe allows. All beings with mass are bound to move in a lattice of space-time under the resistance of the time axis. On the other hand, light with zero mass is completely free from a

1Apr 23

Message

Exploring how actions should be constrained before execution in AI systems.

Some notes here:

https://github.com/Jang-woo-AnnaSoft/execution-boundaries

2

3

7

1mo

Jang-woo Wi's Shortform

Apr 271

Let's rename the theory of relativity

Let's rename the theory of relativity A misunderstanding of someone's name I think the nature of the theory of relativity is obscured by its name. Usually people are buried in the declaration that 'time and space are relative', but I interpret it completely the opposite way. Paradoxically, time and space...

Apr 231

Let’s Rename the Theory of Relativity

Note: This article is a compilation of my thoughts on the "grammar of space-time." Please note that I utilized an AI translation tool to ensure clear delivery in English. Let’s Rename the Theory of Relativity The Grand Misconception of a Name I believe the Theory of Relativity has been obscured...

Apr 231

Should AI have the right to say "No" to its owner?

I’m exploring a framing where control over AI systems comes not from specifying actions, but from specifying when actions are allowed. This seems relevant to questions about AI alignment and real-world agent safety, especially when systems are given the ability to act in physical environments. This might not be a...

Apr 20

Let's rename the theory of relativity

Let's rename the theory of relativity A misunderstanding of someone's name I think the nature of the theory of relativity is obscured by its name. Usually people are buried in the declaration that 'time and space are relative', but I interpret it completely the opposite way. Paradoxically, time and space must be flexibly transformed in order for fundamental physical laws, such as the law of invariance of energy in the universe, to not go against any circumstances. In the end, time and space change at their own expense in order to preserve the consistency of all the other laws of physics. It's a reversal of perspective beyond just the expression "relative." Einstein started with 'the speed of light is unchanged' and came to the conclusion that for the speed of light to be unchanged, the measurements of time and space must vary depending on the observer. In the end, he first established the axiom that 'the laws of physics should be the same for all inertial systems'. And he came to the conclusion that the measurements of time and space should vary depending on the observer in order to ensure the consistency of the law. What he proved is the 'law invariant theory'. The law is the absolute standard, and time and space are the dependent forms that are adjusted to implement it. So I think "absolute" is more accurate than "relativity" in this theory. In fact, modern physicists also use terms like "Laurant's invariance" or "covariance" and focus more on maintaining the law. So why is light invariant? We often give the textbook explanation that "time slows down because the speed of light is constant," but I want to overturn this cause and effect ontologically. The reason why the speed of light is observed unchanged is that it is the physical limit of freedom that this system of the universe allows. All beings with mass are bound to move in a lattice of space-time under the resistance of the time axis. On the other hand, light with zero mass is completely free from a

1Apr 23

Let’s Rename the Theory of Relativity

1Apr 23

Jang-woo Wi's Shortform

1Apr 27

Should AI have the right to say "No" to its owner?

0Apr 2