This is an automated rejection. No LLM generated, assisted/co-written, or edited work.
Read full explanation
Note: This article is a compilation of my thoughts on the "grammar of space-time." Please note that I utilized an AI translation tool to ensure clear delivery in English.
Let’s Rename the Theory of Relativity
The Grand Misconception of a Name
I believe the Theory of Relativity has been obscured by its own name. People tend to get bogged down in the declaration that "time and space are relative," but I interpret this in exactly the opposite way. My view is that for the fundamental laws of physics—such as the law of conservation of energy—to remain consistent under any circumstances, time and space must paradoxically be flexible and deform.
In the end, time and space sacrifice themselves and change to safeguard the consistency of all other physical laws. This is a reversal of perspective that goes beyond the simple phrase "it’s relative."
Einstein started from the premise that "the speed of light is constant." To maintain that constancy, he reached the conclusion that the measured values of time and space must vary depending on the observer.
Ultimately, he established the axiom that "the laws of physics must be identical in all inertial frames." To protect the absolute consistency of those laws, he concluded that time and space must adjust. What he actually proved was the "Theory of Invariant Laws." The laws are the absolute standard; time and space are merely subordinate forms adjusted to manifest those laws.
This is why I believe "Absolutivity" is a more accurate term than "Relativity." In fact, modern physicists focus more on the preservation of laws, using terms like "Lorentz Invariance" or "Covariance."
Then Why is Light Constant?
We often hear the textbook explanation: "Because the speed of light is constant, time slows down." I want to flip this causally and ontologically. The reason the speed of light is observed as constant is that it represents the physical limit of freedom allowed by this universal system. Every entity with mass is forced to move through the grid of spacetime while facing resistance from the "time axis."
In contrast, light—having zero mass—is entirely free from this resistance. It possesses flawless freedom. Thus, light is the limit of freedom flowing along the "boundary of time and space," making it the freest entity in our spacetime. We have understood the movement of objects only in terms of spatial distance, but in reality, we are moving through four dimensions, including the time axis. The greater the mass, the harder it is to create a change (slope) in the time axis; but light, being massless, runs with the maximum freedom the universe permits.
What Does the "Speed" of Light Actually Mean?
Many treat E=mc^2 as a mysterious formula that fell from the sky, but it is actually the simplest and clearest link between Newtonian mechanics and modern physics.
It is the result of taking the Newtonian kinetic energy formula, E=1/2mv^2, and inputting the condition: "The limit of v is c." The c in this formula isn't just an arbitrary value; it represents the "absolute limit of speed" allowed by our spacetime. In other words, it is the "constant that defines the structure of spacetime."
E=mc^2 represents the "rest energy" inherently contained within mass even when stationary, while E=1/2mv^2 is merely a mathematical approximation of the added kinetic energy when an object moves at low speeds. Newton didn't know the energy of a stationary object; he only calculated the change in moving objects. Newton even invented calculus to calculate those changes, but he didn't know the "grammar of spacetime."
The Grammar of Spacetime?
If mass is the "resistance" on the spatial axis, then velocity is the "slope" on the time axis. And $c$ is the maximum slope allowed by the universe—the boundary line of spacetime transformation. Ultimately, the total conversion of mass into energy means reducing spatial resistance (slope) to zero and converging the flow of time to zero, reaching the "state of light." The identity of this formula is a reinterpretation of Newton’s world of mass and force through the lens of spacetime slopes and limit velocity.
What is the "State of Light"?
"An object with mass cannot reach the speed of light." Einstein said this. He also said that for a moving object, time slows down and distance shortens. What happens when we apply Newtonian calculus here? Differentiation is about limits. If time slows down to the limit? It means time stops. For light, time stands still. While we observe light traveling at 300,000 km/s, light’s own time is stopped and its distance is extremely contracted. What happens when it’s extremely short? It becomes Zero. (The proper time defined for light converges to zero.)
From the moment it is born, light moves across the shortest possible distance in frozen time until it is absorbed somewhere. Its beginning and end are simultaneous; it exists from one end of the universe to the other until it encounters something.
Philosophically, this is a captivating interpretation, even if it borders on the forbidden zones of rigorous physics. But hey, I’m not a physicist, right?
So, is the Speed of Light Always the Same?
These insights inevitably lead to the question: "Why did our universe choose this specific speed?" This is directly linked to how the magnitude and direction of forces were determined during the Big Bang. The speed of light ($c$) we observe is the "grammar" our universe adopted to maintain its own internal consistency.
Therefore, in a parallel universe with different initial conditions, the limit of speed ($c$) itself could be different. Each universe would have chosen a different ratio of spacetime to preserve its own existence. If other universes exist, they might operate under different grammars and laws than ours. Do they exist? People talk about the multiverse all the time. Well, who knows?
Epilogue: That’s all for today! These are just some thoughts I organized to cool down my brain. If the response is good, I might continue, but it might be delayed if I get too busy.
Note: This article is a compilation of my thoughts on the "grammar of space-time." Please note that I utilized an AI translation tool to ensure clear delivery in English.
Let’s Rename the Theory of Relativity
The Grand Misconception of a Name
I believe the Theory of Relativity has been obscured by its own name. People tend to get bogged down in the declaration that "time and space are relative," but I interpret this in exactly the opposite way. My view is that for the fundamental laws of physics—such as the law of conservation of energy—to remain consistent under any circumstances, time and space must paradoxically be flexible and deform.
In the end, time and space sacrifice themselves and change to safeguard the consistency of all other physical laws. This is a reversal of perspective that goes beyond the simple phrase "it’s relative."
Einstein started from the premise that "the speed of light is constant." To maintain that constancy, he reached the conclusion that the measured values of time and space must vary depending on the observer.
Ultimately, he established the axiom that "the laws of physics must be identical in all inertial frames." To protect the absolute consistency of those laws, he concluded that time and space must adjust. What he actually proved was the "Theory of Invariant Laws." The laws are the absolute standard; time and space are merely subordinate forms adjusted to manifest those laws.
This is why I believe "Absolutivity" is a more accurate term than "Relativity." In fact, modern physicists focus more on the preservation of laws, using terms like "Lorentz Invariance" or "Covariance."
Then Why is Light Constant?
We often hear the textbook explanation: "Because the speed of light is constant, time slows down." I want to flip this causally and ontologically. The reason the speed of light is observed as constant is that it represents the physical limit of freedom allowed by this universal system. Every entity with mass is forced to move through the grid of spacetime while facing resistance from the "time axis."
In contrast, light—having zero mass—is entirely free from this resistance. It possesses flawless freedom. Thus, light is the limit of freedom flowing along the "boundary of time and space," making it the freest entity in our spacetime. We have understood the movement of objects only in terms of spatial distance, but in reality, we are moving through four dimensions, including the time axis. The greater the mass, the harder it is to create a change (slope) in the time axis; but light, being massless, runs with the maximum freedom the universe permits.
What Does the "Speed" of Light Actually Mean?
Many treat E=mc^2 as a mysterious formula that fell from the sky, but it is actually the simplest and clearest link between Newtonian mechanics and modern physics.
It is the result of taking the Newtonian kinetic energy formula, E=1/2mv^2, and inputting the condition: "The limit of v is c." The c in this formula isn't just an arbitrary value; it represents the "absolute limit of speed" allowed by our spacetime. In other words, it is the "constant that defines the structure of spacetime."
E=mc^2 represents the "rest energy" inherently contained within mass even when stationary, while E=1/2mv^2 is merely a mathematical approximation of the added kinetic energy when an object moves at low speeds. Newton didn't know the energy of a stationary object; he only calculated the change in moving objects. Newton even invented calculus to calculate those changes, but he didn't know the "grammar of spacetime."
The Grammar of Spacetime?
If mass is the "resistance" on the spatial axis, then velocity is the "slope" on the time axis. And $c$ is the maximum slope allowed by the universe—the boundary line of spacetime transformation. Ultimately, the total conversion of mass into energy means reducing spatial resistance (slope) to zero and converging the flow of time to zero, reaching the "state of light." The identity of this formula is a reinterpretation of Newton’s world of mass and force through the lens of spacetime slopes and limit velocity.
What is the "State of Light"?
"An object with mass cannot reach the speed of light." Einstein said this. He also said that for a moving object, time slows down and distance shortens. What happens when we apply Newtonian calculus here? Differentiation is about limits. If time slows down to the limit? It means time stops. For light, time stands still. While we observe light traveling at 300,000 km/s, light’s own time is stopped and its distance is extremely contracted. What happens when it’s extremely short? It becomes Zero. (The proper time defined for light converges to zero.)
From the moment it is born, light moves across the shortest possible distance in frozen time until it is absorbed somewhere. Its beginning and end are simultaneous; it exists from one end of the universe to the other until it encounters something.
Philosophically, this is a captivating interpretation, even if it borders on the forbidden zones of rigorous physics. But hey, I’m not a physicist, right?
So, is the Speed of Light Always the Same?
These insights inevitably lead to the question: "Why did our universe choose this specific speed?" This is directly linked to how the magnitude and direction of forces were determined during the Big Bang. The speed of light ($c$) we observe is the "grammar" our universe adopted to maintain its own internal consistency.
Therefore, in a parallel universe with different initial conditions, the limit of speed ($c$) itself could be different. Each universe would have chosen a different ratio of spacetime to preserve its own existence. If other universes exist, they might operate under different grammars and laws than ours. Do they exist? People talk about the multiverse all the time. Well, who knows?
Epilogue: That’s all for today! These are just some thoughts I organized to cool down my brain. If the response is good, I might continue, but it might be delayed if I get too busy.