Intuitively, it can be that language contains the schemes of human thought, not just as that abstract thing which produced the stream of language, but within the language itself, even though we did not lay down explicitly the algorithm of a human in words. If imitation training can find associations that somehow tap into this recursiveness, it could be that optimizing the imitation of a relatively short amount of human text was sufficient to crack humans.
This is well said. When does acting becomes indistinguishable from reality? In human world,...
This is reinforcement learning, and it worked out spectacularly for AlphaGo (having to operate in a much greater search space than chess, BTW). In more const... (read more)