Although I've heard the advice to leave after a year, my experience has been different - after three years, I'm still learning a lot and I'm beginning to tackle the really hard problems. Basically, I find myself agreeing with Yossi Kreinin's reply to Patrick McKenzie's advice, at least so far. (Both links are very much worth reading.)
Of course, you do need to push for interesting assignments and space to learn. Also, be sure to pick a company that actually does something interesting in the first place - I work on embedded crypto devices for the government market, in a company that's young enough that there's still plenty of flexibility.
Thanks, Nancy, for putting in this effort.
Some people do need to see that link, but note that it, too, is rather dangerous.
And, of course, encouraging homeownership makes this worse. Good thing that most of the Western world hasn't made that an explicit policy goal for the past decade...
I was pretty happy about that, actually.
I assume that TheAncientGeek has actually submitted the survey; in that case, their comment is "proof" that they deserve karma.
I, too, took the survey. (And promptly forgot to claim my karma; oh well.)
I didn't exactly disagree with the content, right?
Part of the problem is just that writing something good about epistemic rationality is really hard, even if you stick to the 101 level - and, well, I don't really care about 101 anymore. But I have plenty of sympathy for those writing more practical posts.
This is not nice - could you try to find a more pleasant way to say this?
Also, LW does do epistemic rationality - but it's easier to say something useful and new about practical matters, so there are more posts of that kind.