Such proof-of-stake seems like a prohibitive friction cost and would prevent many legitimate authors from publishing, and many illegitimate authors honestly believe that their work will replicate, and many legitimate authors' work fails to replicate anyway. The analogy to proof-of-stake (in the original post) is inexact, it's closer to proof-of-stake in academia.
the way you bold key parts of prose (i do like this, but it does feel LLMy).
the way you end on aphorisms:
these phrases:
and the section titles intuitively feel LLMy.