What's the significance of this fallacy, as in why is it a valid fallacy instead of a new variant of a straw man? I understand that quoting prominent discussions would offend some ppl (the ones making this fallacy) but that is one of the best ways to support the significance of this fallacy. As is this sounds like a simple aggregate of a few fallacies not worthy of a new name.
What's the significance of this fallacy, as in why is it a valid fallacy instead of a new variant of a straw man? I understand that quoting prominent discussions would offend some ppl (the ones making this fallacy) but that is one of the best ways to support the significance of this fallacy. As is this sounds like a simple aggregate of a few fallacies not worthy of a new name.