No posts to display.
Taubes understand the value of falsification, such as mice starving to death while getting fat from little eating.
This falsifies the "calories in, calories out" hypothesis, which was quite ambiguous anyway.
His talks, and writings, have many falsifications like this. The main post here has none.
And yet again I am reminded why I do not frequent this supposedly rational forum more.
Rationality swishes by over most peoples head here, except for a few really smart ones.
You people make it too complicated. You write too much. Lots of these supposedly deep intellectual problems have quite simple...(read more)
Bayesian reasoning is for maximizing the probability of being right.
Kelly´s criterion is for maximizing aggregated value.
And yet again, the distributions of the probabilities are **different**, because they have different variance, and difference in variance give different aggregated value, which...(read more)
No, because expected value is not the same thing as variance.
Betting on red gives 1/3 winnings, exactly.
Betting on green gives 1/3 +/- x winnings, and this is a variance, which is bad.
Preferring red is rational, because it is a known amount of risk, while each of the other two colours have unknown risks.
This is according to Kellys criterion and Darwinian evolution. Negative outcomes outweigh positive ones because negative ones lead to sickness and death through starvation, poor...(read more)
There often is not any difference at all between flirting and friendliness. People vary very much in their ways. And yet we are supposed to easily tell the difference, with threat of imprisonment for failing.
The main effects I have seen and experienced, is that flirting typically involve more eye ...(read more)
Most places I have worked, the reputation of the job has been quite different from the actual job. I have compared my experiences with those of friends and colleagues, and they are relatively similar. Having a M.Sc. in physics and lots of programming experience made it possible for me to have more d...(read more)
I am, and I am planning to leave it to get a higher more average pay.
From my viewpoint, it is terribly overrated and undervalued.
That was a damn good article!
It was short, to the point, and based on real data, and useful as well.
So unlike the polite verbiage of karma whores.
Even William of Ockham would have been proud of you.
I wondered how humans are grouped, so I got some genes from the world, and did an eigenvalue analysis, and this is what i found:
As you can see, humans are indeed clustered in subspecies.