LESSWRONG
LW

KristianRonn
1725100
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

Sequences

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
The Darwinian Trap
No wikitag contributions to display.
Replicators, Gods and Buddhist Cosmology
KristianRonn7mo10

It doesn't disprove the doomsday argument. It does offer an alternative explanation however. 
 

Why would a future civilization specifically choose to simulate many instances of the time we're currently in if it doesn't have a significance to that time period? 

Don't think they necessarily care about a specific time period. I think they care about: can they learn how the simulated beings interact with a new technology in a way that prevents them to repeat or mistakes. And it could be the case that our particular time is the most efficient to learn from (i.e. the time that happens right before you might go extinct).  

Reply
The Fragility of Life Hypothesis and the Evolution of Cooperation
KristianRonn1y21

Good point.  Will add a bit of a better bridge for part 3 (that I hope to realease in a week). 

Reply
The Fragility of Life Hypothesis and the Evolution of Cooperation
KristianRonn1y40

Thanks, Sebastian! One of the strongest arguments against the Fragility of Life Hypothesis is that evolution through natural selection may be meta-stable. If life is diverse enough, it becomes difficult for Kamikaze mutants to kill all forms of life.  As long as some life persists, competitive Lotka-Volterra equations suggest that populations in the ecosystem will stabilize after the catastrophy. 

However, the most reliable way to assess the true stability of life, free from survivorship bias, is likely through detailed evolutionary simulations and continued exploration for life within our solar system.

Reply
The Fragility of Life Hypothesis and the Evolution of Cooperation
KristianRonn1y10

Thank you Maxime! Very cool to hear, and feel free to send me an email if you potential collaborations down the line. :) 

Reply
Darwinian Traps and Existential Risks
KristianRonn1y20

Good point. I will cover a lot of this in part 2. Essentially I think we are falling victim to survivorship bias. E.g. we will find ourselves in a place in the universe where cooperation is more common since it is needed for complex life and observers like us.

Reply
Darwinian Traps and Existential Risks
KristianRonn1y41

Thank you Seb! And you are correct! 😊

Reply
Darwinian Traps and Existential Risks
KristianRonn1y10

Got it.

Reply
Darwinian Traps and Existential Risks
KristianRonn1y64

Yes, agreed. Teleology is still very useful in biology. Describing the above post with chemistry would be like describing a high level programing language using only NAND gates (I.e. not very useful).

Reply1
Darwinian Traps and Existential Risks
KristianRonn1y30

Sure. It's an optimization process. At least in my vocabulary process and algorithm are more or less synonymous. But totally fine with calling it a process instead.

What in your mind are the wrong intuition created from calling it an algorithm?

Reply
Darwinian Traps and Existential Risks
KristianRonn1y52

So natural selection is not optimizing fitness? Please elaborate. 😊

Reply
Load More
15Replicators, Gods and Buddhist Cosmology
8mo
3
12The Great Bootstrap
11mo
0
50The Fragility of Life Hypothesis and the Evolution of Cooperation
1y
6
85Darwinian Traps and Existential Risks
1y
14