Let me clarify, is your conclusion then that basically we should support the genocide of the whole of humanity because the alternative would be way worse? Are you offering some other alternatives except of that? Maybe a better and less apocalyptic conclusion would be to advocate against building any type of AI that's more advanced than we have today like some people already do? Do you think there's any chance for that? Because I don't and from what you said it sounds like the only conclusion is that the only future for us is that we all die from the hands of Clippy.

>... a very, very small percentage of them?

So you totally discard the results of the Stanford prison experiment or the Milgram experiment? It wasn't a small percentage of people who went to the maximal punishment available in the case of the Milgram experiment for example.