User Profile

star33
description91
message3183

Recent Posts

Curated Posts
starCurated - Recent, high quality posts selected by the LessWrong moderation team.
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed
Frontpage Posts
Posts meeting our frontpage guidelines: • interesting, insightful, useful • aim to explain, not to persuade • avoid meta discussion • relevant to people whether or not they are involved with the LessWrong community.
(includes curated content and frontpage posts)
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed
All Posts
personIncludes personal and meta blogposts (as well as curated and frontpage).
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed

Value learners & wireheading

2y
5 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
3

Communicating concepts in value learning

2y
3 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
5

Meetup : Urbana-Champaign: Quorum for discourse

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Moral AI: Options

3y
4 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
6

Limited agents need approximate induction

3y
7 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
10

Selfish preferences and self-modification

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
24

Treating anthropic selfish preferences as an extension of TDT

3y
11 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
16

How many people am I?

3y
2 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
27

Meetup : Urbana-Champaign: Finishing Up

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Meetup : Urbana-Champaign: Seeking advice

3y
1 min read
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
0

Recent Comments

This site isn't too active - maybe email someone from CFAR directly?

Man, this interviewer sure likes to ask dense questions. Bostrom sort of responded to them, but things would have gone a lot smoother if LARB guy (okay, Andy Fitch) had limited himself to one or two questions at a time. Still, it's kind of shocking the extent to which Andy "got it," given that he do...(read more)

Hm, the format is interesting. The end product is, ideally, a tree of arguments, with each argument having an attached relevance rating from the audience. I like that they didn't try to use the pro and con arguments to influence the rating of the parent argument, because that would be too reflective...(read more)

> Infinity minus one isn't smaller than infinity. That's not useful in that way.

The thing being added or subtracted is not the mere number of hypotheses, but a measure of the likelihood of those hypotheses. We might suppose an infinitude of mutually exclusive theories of the world, but most of the...(read more)

I think this neglects the idea of "physical law," which says that theories can be good when they capture the dynamics and building-blocks of the world simply, even if they are quite ignorant about the complex initial conditions of the world.

> Can't this be modelled as uncertainty over functional equivalence? (or over input-output maps)?

Hm, that's an interesting point. Is what we care about just the brute input-output map? If we're faced with a black-box predictor, then yes, all that matters is the correlation even if we don't know th...(read more)

Interesting that resnets still seem state of the art. I was expecting them to have been replaced by something more heterogeneous by now. But I might be overrating the usefulness of discrete composition because it's easy to understand.

Plausibly? LW2 seems to be doing okay, which is gonna siphon off posts and comments.

The dust probably is just dust - scattering of blue light more than red is the same reason the sky is blue and the sun looks red at sunset (Rayleigh scattering / Mie scattering). It comes from scattering off of particles smaller than a few times the wavelength of the light - so if visible light is ...(read more)