AI analysis got moderated away unfortunately. Chatgpt gave it a 8.5/10 style consistency and very high conceptual alignment (in Soviet Russia, AI align you!) It says my contest viability is strong, even without changes (I made none of the suggested changes, one of which was to leave a section without a conclusion because apparently lsusr (aka me) is known to do that.) It also said I was too clear. Weird.
[This is an entry for lsusr’s write-like-lsusr competition.]
I meditated on suffering and came up with several half-baked ideas. Their apparent contradictions with each other and with my previous writings is a feature, not a bug; if you meditate on them, you may be enlightened.
The Shrimp Meditation Project. Trillions of shrimp are possibly suffering horribly every year (we know this because they aren't cute, so it's an especially strong countersignal to care about them, plus Math.) If we can teach them how to meditate, we can alleviate their suffering. I propose a large scale operation where we breed shrimp to be more capable of meditation, then sell the best bloodlines to the factory
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/zfWEkJxbraymvqtjS/meditations-on-suffering-1
AI says this is highly similar to lsusr, analysis in reply
My post was intended seriously (well, parts of it are obviously a joke) and I didn't put much effort into making it sound like lsusr, as the rules explicitly said I could post anyway. Besides, since I am lsusr I don't need to imitate myself.
The serious parts of my post are serious, anyway.