LESSWRONG
LW

1357
Molybdaenmornell
0020
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No posts to display.
No wikitag contributions to display.
Not for the Sake of Happiness (Alone)
Molybdaenmornell3y10

"I value freedom:  When I'm deciding where to steer the future, I take into account not only the subjective states that people end up in, but also whether they got there as a result of their own efforts."

I am somewhat the same but must recognise that it is possible that, were I to be forced into pure bliss, I would not want to go back. My value set may shift or reveal itself to not be what I thought it was. (I think it is possible, maybe even normal, to be somewhat mistaken about which values one lives by.) In fact, it seems exceedingly plausible to me that I value freedom the more because I know what it means to be defenceless and in danger. I would care far less about having a back door out of anything if I perceived no threats.

And that begs the question which values am I to consider 'right': The ones I live by now or the ones I think it likely I would have in, for want of a better word, paradise?

Reply
Not for the Sake of Happiness (Alone)
Molybdaenmornell3y10

Which raises the question: Is the latter an instrumental or a terminal value? Or does it vary?

Reply