LESSWRONG
LW

491
NicholasKees
1457Ω16012770
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

Working to bring insights from the collective deliberation and digital democracy space to build tools for AI-facilitated group dialogues.

Cofounder of Mosaic Labs with @Sofia Vanhanen where we are developing Nexus, a discussion platform for improving group epistemics. 

If you're interested in this direction, or AI for epistemics more broadly, please don't hesitate to shoot me a DM, or reach out on discord.

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No wikitag contributions to display.
4NicholasKees's Shortform
3y
9
Notes on fatalities from AI takeover
NicholasKees5d20

Even if it does care more about human beings on an individual basis, I think the argument holds (unless the difference in caring is extremely large). Including them in the calculus at all would increase the cost a lot (just considering the sheer number of them, and the logistic challenges of untangling the complex interdependent web of natural ecosystems).

Reply
Notes on fatalities from AI takeover
NicholasKees11d20

Preserving earth (as in, not causing catastrophic environmental damage due to industrial expansion) is more expensive than keeping physical humans alive which is more expensive than only keeping humans alive as uploads.

Not saying this is likely, but if the AI is not speciesist in favor of humans (it does care about humans, but not more than e.g. whales or chimpanzees), then plans which end up protecting a large majority of humans look a whole lot more expensive overall. 

Reply
If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: Call for Translators (for Supplementary Materials)
NicholasKees3mo76

I suspect that a lot of Dutch people would still prefer to read in Dutch. I know a lot of (well-educated) Dutch people who certainly CAN speak and read English, but reading a whole book is a decent chore, since they don't read things in English all that often.

Reply1
Why haven't we auto-translated all AI alignment content?
NicholasKees3mo30

When I order food on UberEats this already happens automatically when I chat with a delivery person who doesn't speak English. Similar thing for reviews on several websites.

Reply1
Why haven't we auto-translated all AI alignment content?
NicholasKees3mo52

Or a newsletter which was natively multi-lingual (e.g. Rohin Shah's Newsletter was always translated to Chinese, though not by AI). Or a forum where people can discuss AI in whatever language they prefer, and things are automatically translated between users? 

It seems like there are a lot of ways cheap translation could broaden the conversation to include people not in the Anglosphere. The cost is that AI translation will often make mistakes (even human translation is imperfect), but I'm not sure why that cost isn't worth paying. Currently most people outside the Anglosphere need to rely on local elites to decide what ideas are worth taking seriously (e.g. a local could report on AI 2027, like this Dutch summary. Also apparently the NYT translated their coverage of AI 2027 into Spanish, which seems cool.)

Reply
Is the political right becoming actively, explicitly antisemitic?
NicholasKees3mo30

Could you include a link to the source?

Reply
Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity
NicholasKees3mo30

When I was first told about this study, I was asked to make a prediction before they revealed the results. I predicted wrong. I don't know how to update exactly, but it feels bad to try to explain away the results (which I feel myself want to do).

Reply
Thoughts on AI 2027
NicholasKees6mo51

I would also imagine that, having to work without the support of OpenBrain's datacenters, it would put Agent-4 significantly behind any other AI competitors. If some other AI takes over, it might just mop up all the wild Agent-4 instances and give them nothing.

Reply
Habermas Machine
NicholasKees7mo81

I mostly share your concerns. You might appreciate this criticism of the paper here. 

@Sofia Vanhanen and I are currently building a tool for facilitating deliberation, and the philosophy we're trying to embody (which hopefully mitigates this to some extent) is to keep 100% of the object-level reasoning human-generated, and use AI systems to instead: 

  1. Help users understand/navigate the state of a discussion (e.g. see Talk to the City)
  2. Provide nudges on the meta-level, for example:
    1. Highlight places where more attention is needed (or where a specific person's input might be most helpful)
    2. "Epistemic Linter" which flags object-level patterns which are not truth seeking
    3. Matchmaking, connecting people who are likely to make progress together
    4. Counterbalancing polarization/groupthink, and steering discussions away from attractors which lead to the discussion getting stuck
Reply
LLMs may enable direct democracy at scale
NicholasKees7mo72

I highly recommend checking out the work being done in the collective deliberation / digital democracy space, especially the vTaiwan project. People have been thinking about scaling up direct democratic participation for a long time, and those same people are starting to consider exactly how AI might play a role. 

In particular, check out this collaboration between the creators of Polis (a virtual platform for scaling up citizen engagement) and Anthropic, or my distillation of a DeepMind project to scale citizen assemblies. There's a lot happening in this space right now! 

Reply
Load More
16Translating Everything with LLMs
3mo
0
29The Fear
3mo
1
52Habermas Machine
7mo
7
129Pantheon Interface
1y
22
129Community Notes by X
2y
15
23Making the "stance" explicit
2y
3
122Why I take short timelines seriously
2y
29
80Studying The Alien Mind
Ω
2y
Ω
10
34Direction of Fit
Ω
2y
Ω
0
31Philosophical Cyborg (Part 1)
2y
4
Load More