I've taken the time to study the Wolfram Model for about 2.5 years now, post December 2020 update to the model. I've learned enough about it to give operational definition and applicability to model systems, and to create systems under that framework.
I think people simply don't understand the implications of this work...like at all. As someone that also studied physics for a long time...some of the issues of physics poke out even more glaringly when viewed through Wolfram's model...about how backwards the current physics paradigm is.
Most of the criticisms are aimed at his persona...which has nothing to do with science. When the critics do want to talk science, they always bring up the things that blatantly misdirect the argument. For example bringing up "does it make predictions" when he just spoke for 20 minutes about computational irreducibility lmao.
I've taken the time to study the Wolfram Model for about 2.5 years now, post December 2020 update to the model. I've learned enough about it to give operational definition and applicability to model systems, and to create systems under that framework.
I think people simply don't understand the implications of this work...like at all. As someone that also studied physics for a long time...some of the issues of physics poke out even more glaringly when viewed through Wolfram's model...about how backwards the current physics paradigm is.
Most of the criticisms are aimed at his persona...which has nothing to do with science. When the critics do want to talk science, they always bring up the things that blatantly misdirect the argument. For example bringing up "does it make predictions" when he just spoke for 20 minutes about computational irreducibility lmao.