LESSWRONG
LW

noam
2050
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No wikitag contributions to display.
Infra-Bayesian physicalism: a formal theory of naturalized induction
noam2y10

Can someone break Definition 1.1 down for me? I got lost in all the notation and what acts on what, what is projected to where..

Reply
Untangling Infrabayesianism: A redistillation [PDF link; ~12k words + lots of math]
noam2y10

Though now that I think about it, if the difference is some irrational number then this seems to work, as any set Xi would contain exactly one unique rational number. Now they each have the cardinality of R, and the family has the cardinality of Q. And then it all seems to work.
Does that seem right?

Reply
Untangling Infrabayesianism: A redistillation [PDF link; ~12k words + lots of math]
noam2y10

I fail to see why the family of sets Xi is countable. if Xi is of cardinality ℵ0, which I totally agree about, then how can a union of a countable family of them which is basically ℵ0×ℵ0 be equal (0,1)?

Reply
Untangling Infrabayesianism: A redistillation [PDF link; ~12k words + lots of math]
noam2y21

What do you mean by "no reasonable σ-algebra can encompass the full power set"? The power set is the biggest σ-algebra of a set, but what set? And what is "reasonable"?

Reply
Untangling Infrabayesianism: A redistillation [PDF link; ~12k words + lots of math]
noam2y21

Found a typo:

Definition 2.2. Let X be a metric space. We say that a functional f:X→R is k-Lipschitz
continuous if there exists k≥0∈R such that for all x,y∈X,dX(f(x),f(y))≤k⋅|x−y|. In
such a case k is called the Lipschitz constant of f.

I think it should be: |f(x)−f(y)|≤k⋅dX(x,y) instead, as f(x),f(y)∈R while x,y∈X.

Reply
No posts to display.