Interesting. I don't understand why one cant continuously modify the theory to accommodate each new fact, even if each amendment becomes increasingly convoluted, as long as it remains technically congruent. You seem to imply that this is not probable because the lier doesn't have an incentive. Could you specify/elaborate?
Interesting. I don't understand why one cant continuously modify the theory to accommodate each new fact, even if each amendment becomes increasingly convoluted, as long as it remains technically congruent. You seem to imply that this is not probable because the lier doesn't have an incentive. Could you specify/elaborate?