first of all thank you for your response.

thank you for your precision, in the future i will assure you that i will try to be more clear in my writing(this is hard for me being both autistic and dyslexic) but even with this your downvote is understandable.

do you have any critique of the idea?

first of all thank your for the time to write your response as i said i am new here and it means a lot.

 i am sorry if my post came off as authoritative but to me it seems you came off more as authoritative than i did. i generally think that it is better to write something novel and wrong than regurgitate already said information. if you have critiques of my ideas as you suggest by saying "(Then, if those resources themselves leave you with confusion, you can express it and work on the problem from there. Alternatively, you could work through the whole problem yourself from first principles, and potentially provide a novel and correct take on the topic; just, you did neither, which is probably where the downvotes came from.)" please express them, i cannot in a short way express how much i want my ideas to be critiqued. to me i seems that I did the latter of the two methodologies you presented---albeit with some changes---, at the very least i attempted to. again if you disagree then state why. 

by the way i said "literally throwing shit out there" which seems clearly not authoritative.

genuinely want to know why this got 21 downvotes. i am new to the culture of less wrong.
is it because?

1: the ideas are trash

2:the formatting is trash

3:it is incomprehensible

seriously please tell me

sinceraly

-not the sprayer