I'm a bottom docker but I get your point. For use cases like this I like ctrl+shift+m a bit more (only usable with devtools on in Chrome). Still, I consider this a suboptimal design.
I found the website design a bit annoying because my eyes need to jump around for every item. When I'm reading the text my eyes are roughly focused onto the big eclipse, and then I need to jump to the right to see the evidence strength and back. It seems like there is enough space to just move them below the one-line summary.
If this is recommended, then (eventually) the UI should allow you to voluntarily reveal the vote.
Did you give up after 10/26
It would be nice to have a post time-sorted quick takes feed. https://www.lesswrong.com/quicktakes seems to be latest comment-sorted or magic sorted
examples of text that you got accused of using LLM?
Collapsed to reduce screen estate
LW Karma
If you have no account, your karma score is 0. Be aware it may be easy to identify you from this information. Feel free to round your karma score if you want to be less identifiable. If your karma score is 15,000 or above, you may put 15,000 if you want to be less identifiable.
FYI I have been giving a number via normal distribution with mean = karma, sigma = some % of karma.
For at least one time you noticed someone else was wrong, did you tell them?
For at least one time you noticed you were wrong, did you tell people?
Why is the top question a multiple choice, but the bottom question a singular choice lol
How many random human lives would you trade for a sportscar? If you'd trade two human lives for one sportscar, write 2, if you'd trade one human life for two sportscar, write 0.5.
I think the only sensible interpretation is "what is the maximum number of human lives you would trade for a sportscar?", but this is quite far from the literal meaning of the question.
Brainstorm:
Set a timer for 60 seconds.
Come up with as many ways to make music using things which are not normally instruments as you can in that time.
What is the thing I am supposed to answer? The number of ways I came up with, or write down all of them?
I feel like the survey should mention how many questions there are, and perhaps how much time you expect people take for each section
I believe people were using PredictionBook before and switched to Fatebook.
Relevant search for people who publicly posted on LessWrong: https://www.lesswrong.com/search?query=calibration&page=1