phdead

TL;DR I explain why I think AI research has been slowing down, not speeding up, in the past few years. How have your expectations for the future of AI research changed in the past three years? Based on recent posts in this forum, it seems that results in text generation, protein folding, image synthesis, and other fields have accomplished feats beyond what was thought possible. From a bird's eye view, it seems as though the breakneck pace of AI research is already accelerating exponentially, which would make the safe bet on AI timelines quite short. This way of thinking misses the reality on the front lines of AI research. Innovation is stalling beyond just throwing more computation at the problem, and the forces that made scaling computation cheaper or more effective are slowing. The past three years of AI results have been dominated by wealthy companies throwing very large models at novel problems. While this expands the economic impact of AI, it does not accelerate AI development. To figure out whether AI development is actually accelerating, we need to answer a few key questions: 1. What has changed in AI in the past three years? 2. Why has it changed, and what factors have allowed that change? 3. How have those underlying factors changed in the past three years? By answering these fundamental questions, we can get a better understanding of how we should expect AI research to develop over the near future. And maybe along the way, you'll learn something about lifting weights too. We shall see. What has changed in AI research in the past three years? Gigantic models have achieved spectacular results on a large variety of tasks. How large is the variety of tasks? In terms of domain area, quite varied. Advances have been made in major hard science problems like protein synthesis, imaginative tasks like creating images from descriptions, and playing complex games like Starcraft. How large is the variety of models used? While each model features many domai