LESSWRONG
LW

244
Minetta
15020
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No posts to display.
No wikitag contributions to display.
Poker is a bad game for teaching epistemics. Figgie is a better one.
Minetta1y51

The real heart of this game is that the trades are not zero sum between the two parties. If you have 5 of a suit and your counterparty has 1, there are huge gains from trade to be had by interacting. This is a totally necessary condition for the game to be interesting. 

Reply
When and why should you use the Kelly criterion?
Minetta2y50

The expected value of the product of two independent random variables is the product of the expected values of each; this concludes my proof that betting everything on each round is expected value maximizing in a finite game (and infinite too, if you adopt the common ways to make "infinite" precise). I'm surprised the dialogue got that far without this being brought up!

Reply