No posts to display.
Let's assume that your utility function (which is identical to theirs) simply weights and adds your payoff and theirs; that is, if you get X and they get Y, your function is U(X,Y) = aX+bY. In that case, working backwards from the utilities in the table, and subject to the constra...(read more)
It's worth considering who's at fault when nobody "gets" a joke.
The purpose of humor is to entertain or communicate in some form; if a joke flops with every member of its target audience, I don't think you can blame said audience without lowering yourself to the standards of smug postmodernist wri...(read more)
I've done this occasionally, actually.
One time, I found a very opinionated guy with a high opinion of himself -- I think he might have been Objectivist, but he scoffed at literally every philosophy he mentioned so it's hard to tell.
I figured that trying to debate him would just end the conversati...(read more)
Perhaps "Get off of Earth before Nemesis sends some more comets our way"
Reasoning: The Roman invasion could have been predicted, but wouldn't have been well supported by evidence -- although foreign invasions were certainly a repeated (eve...(read more)