There’s this specific kind of lying that is endemic on the policy left, where you make absolutely insane and obviously false claims but ground them by linking a paper to a very different situation where no one was able to detect much of an effect.
Hello, I was a little confused when reading this. This might just be because I am new here, but I've seen a lot of paper like the ones referenced before and I haven't seen whats wrong with them. How is something like this https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.17310/ntj.2011.2.02 meaningfully different than the current situation?
Hello, I was a little confused when reading this. This might just be because I am new here, but I've seen a lot of paper like the ones referenced before and I haven't seen whats wrong with them. How is something like this https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.17310/ntj.2011.2.02 meaningfully different than the current situation?