I mean sure if you like baby sitting, you wont necessarily like parenting, but if you hate babysitting (but initially thought you liked kids) wouldn't that be a good indicator that you will not like parenting?
For the inflation adjusted money gain questions, that's was the only varient i would have answered not positively, thinking that there would be no difference. My thinking is that if everyone gain an equal amount more money, that overall there should be not difference.
Edit: on further thought since its a flat amount, it would at the very least reduce wealth inequality thus net good
If branch prediction works for cpus it should also work for conversation. being Novel for the sake of it isn’t efficient. Priming a direction a conversation would go and continuing down that general direction isn’t a bad thing.
Ah I guess a problem is a one shot problem in respect to a goal if it is possible that there will be a be a issue that arrises from the attempt that makes the goal no longer possible? Would that kinda mean that in some way every problem is one shot? Material and time spent on failing to make as shoe is not recoverable though the severity of the loss is probably low.
But also for the first probe example, the attempt at the software update seems like a second attempt where the first would be to have designed the craft to not have had the problem
I probably am one of the dumbs that dont grasp the concept
1
to get over this awkwardness, $100 advance fee is almost not enough of a "cheerful bid"