I didn't even realize there was such a categorization of bikers 

Years ago I tried doing it a couple times and stopped because I fall into group 3 

I tried being group one and an ambulance honked at me because I took a left turn in front of it (sirens were not going off) 

And I just never did it again 

I figured most bikers were group one

Can someone tell me what the actual takeaway is here 

I don't mind a fake out but there were so many fake outs I lost the plot

These are very good 

When you are stuck, make explicit note of what feels difficult about the situation, and brainstorm ways of dealing with those difficulties.

Asking "This is impossible. Why exactly is it impossible?

These are very good 

When you are stuck, make explicit note of what feels difficult about the situation, and brainstorm ways of dealing with those difficulties.

Asking "This is impossible. Why exactly is it impossible?

I wonder how much worse is every incremental year of this is as a % of all suffering experienced in this way throughout history

To my mind it will likely decrease and disappear slowly at first and then all at once as alternatives get better and cheaper

But I wonder if it's at all time high capacity and it every incremental year or 10 years of it is some large % of total suffering caused in this way

This would be way easier to reason about with an example 

I feel like you're probably talking about some specific situation but without that it's very unclear 

I always wondered if other people understood this 

I've experienced this at work and it's just one of those horrible things where I feel so lonely due to being unable to explain it to people (in a politically correct way) 

Like I don't hate the guy who would always pull his sword on me 

Because I deeply understand him because I was closer to him in the past 

And my father was him 

But also I can't work with that guy and do my best work

I think people focus too much on "would US AGI be safer than China" and not as much on "how much safer"

In the sense that US has 15% pdoom and China has 22%, this notion that everyone needs to get onboard and help US win with full effort could be bad

Could be used (and arguably is currently being used) to be even LESS safe, and empower an authoritarian mercantilist behemoth state, and possibly invade other countries for resources 

And in general massively increase and accelerate pdoom simply on the idea that our pdoom is lower than theirs 

I agree with this although it makes me think about company culture 

There is huge emergent value to some of the.. let's call them "softer" communication approaches 

It becomes possible to get out of random suboptimal Nash equilibriums almost immediately 

People can give more to each other, and better receive feedback 

But I think the only way to do this is by having the type of people who already think in those terms and prefer them 

There's not a lot you can do to enforce it 

But it's still a thing, and in my opinion it's still a thing worth moving spaces for (to the extent that you have the luxury to do so)

I don't know that it scales very well, but at a certain scale it's an incredible thing

I'm currently leaving a job over this 

There are still some people who I know are capable of engaging in this way 

But we've kind of lost the battle, we lost too many critical people in our management chain 

So everyone is kind of reverting to these shittier communication styles 

It's a bummer, and it just slows everything down so much

I'm getting strong DarqqWolf vibes to this whole saga

Although I've been that guy like 15 yrs ago, so I don't fault him for it that much

And at least he's pushing a fairly novel idea and taking it seriously