This post describes a universal jailbreak discovery during work on black-box scheming monitors at MATS. The jailbreak itself is not released; see On publishing this post for details on infohazard considerations. This post is written in a personal capacity and all opinions contained here are my own, and not the...
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29601 Thread: https://x.com/aksh_n0/status/2062568855814193497 TL;DR: Training small open-weight monitors provides a cost-effective alternative to prompted frontier monitors. Applying our training recipe to Qwen3.5-27B results in a monitor better at scheming detection than all smaller prompted monitors (Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, GPT-5.4 Nano, Claude Haiku 4.5) and Gemini 2.5 Pro, while achieving...
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00829 Thread: https://x.com/syghmon/status/2028878121051496674 Executive Summary Black-box monitors can detect scheming in AI agents using only externally observable information (no access to internal activations or chain-of-thought). We introduce two synthetic data pipelines, STRIDE and Gloom, for generating both benign and scheming trajectories. We optimize these monitors entirely on synthetic data...
This was a quick, short side-project produced during the MATS Research 8.1 extension. It's related to my group's main thread of work on black-box scheming monitoring through the connections to monitoring I explore below, but was time-boxed and pursued independently because I thought it was interesting! Executive Summary Figure 1....
Epistemic status: Based on multiple accounts, I’m confident that frontier labs keep some safety research internal-only, but I’m much less confident on the reasons underlying this. Many benign explanations exist and may well suffice, but I wanted to explore other possible incentives and dynamics which may come into play at...
Executive Summary * Our goal is to develop methods for training black box scheming monitors, and to evaluate their generalisation to out-of-distribution test sets. * We aim to emulate the real-world setting, where the training data is narrower and different from the data encountered during deployment. * We train our...