romeostevensit

romeostevensit's Comments

Use-cases for computations, other than running them?

The process used to generate a valid computation could itself be a valuable compression/training process of some sort. Characteristics of the final computation might be useful as feedback. I guess generalizing is just taking your listed use cases and seeing the computation in question as either up or downstream from the thing we really care about.

How does a Living Being solve the problem of Subsystem Alignment?

Imagine that Herman Melville was doing IFS and that the book is his notes. There are different ways to think about how he splits things up into different characters (just as everyone's ifs process is idiosyncratic but has recurring patterns), but the overall frame winds up feeling like it just fits. And I don't mean this in the vacuous 'everything could be an IFS manual if you think about it' way. I'm actually not familiar with any others besides those two that are central examples of the thing. Thinking for a bit I'd venture The Metamorphosis probably counts, maybe No Exit.

Also Jed Mckenna has a book that discuses this for Moby Dick so I'm not the only one who's noticed. Though IIRC it's only a side story in Jed's book (Spiritually Incorrect Enlightenment).

Risk and uncertainty: A false dichotomy?

I found Marr's levels highly helpful when trying to think about this area. YMMV. Marr's levels also correspond to Aristotle's four causes if we do as Marr does and split the algorithmic level into 'representation' and 'traversal.'

Book review: Rethinking Consciousness

Unfortunately I don't know of a good overview. Chalmers might have one. Lukeprogs post on consciousness has some pointers.

How does a Living Being solve the problem of Subsystem Alignment?

The Republic is about this. As is Moby Dick though it is not explicit in the latter whereas the metaphor is explicitly declared in the former. Plato's stuff actually makes even more sense if you append the death of socrates cycle to the end of the republic. First you instantiate the philosopher king who puts the house in order, then the philosopher king commits suicide as a logical result of the rules as set up by that very same philosopher king.

Can we always assign, and make sense of, subjective probabilities?

in the most extreme case, something that, by its very nature, would never leave any evidence of its truth or falsity.

In Buddhism this comes from fundamental ignorance. Bundling together incoherent concepts due to not perceiving their actual structure. The parable of the coins is used to illustrate that the child and the normal person both have different types of ignorance about coins (currency) and only the money changer has a correct causal view.

Can we always assign, and make sense of, subjective probabilities?

In practice, I try to understand the generator for the claim. I.e. the experience plus belief structures that lead to a claim like it to make sense to the person. This doesn't address the central problem, and on inspection I guess what I'm doing is trying to reconcile my own intuitive sense of miniscule probability of the claim as stated to me and the much higher probability implied by the form of the claim to them.

Also knightian uncertainty seems relevant but I'm not sure how quantitatively speaking.

Reality-Revealing and Reality-Masking Puzzles

This seems like a good place to mention that if you are thinking about the future, doing contemplative practice, and get philosophically disoriented, and normal therapists and meditation teachers feel like they aren't actually addressing your concerns, that I am more than happy to talk with you. Traditional instructions often don't really emphasize that periods of high confusion are expected if you're doing the thing correctly because it just doesn't matter in a monastic context where you have a highly highly structured environment to fall back on.

Where are people thinking and talking about global coordination for AI safety?

Not really. Although proto joint stock corps existed at the time, The Glorious Revolution and the importation of Dutch commercial trading practices was a significant event.

Red Flags for Rationalization

Moral licensing: behaviorally connecting between two causally unrelated things as a justification for one of them.

Tu quoque: looking for ways others have failed to live up to an epistemic standard to excuse yourself. Related to kakonomics.

Becoming defensive and frustrated and retreating to vague language when asked for more specifics.

Load More