A link to the original article would be appreciated

How many people are working on test-time learning? How feasible do you think it is?

I see. Why do you have this impression that the default algorithms would do this? Genuinely asking, since I haven't seen convincing evidence of this.

I don't know, the obviously wrong things you see on the internet seems to differ a lot based on your recommendation algorithm. The strawmanny sjw takes you list are mostly absent from my algorithm. In contrast, I see LOTS of absurd right-wing takes in my feed.

The links to subsections in the table of contents seem to be broken.

It's Galaxy A54.

I'm not sure how to share screenshots on mobile on LW 😅

The idea seems cool but the feed doesn't work well on my phone. It cuts the sides of the text which makes things unreadable. (I have a Samsung)

Now, the EU itself needs some reforms badly, namely, as Draghi report suggests, relaxing the regulation, but there seems no political will to do that. At least, last time I’ve checked I have still seen those annoying “accept cookies” banners alive and kicking.

This is not true; there is a lot of political will for deregulation and simplification (see e.g. here). Everyone is talking about it in Brussels. 

I assume the point about "accept cookies" banners was a joke, but just in case it wasn't: it takes time for regulations to be changed, so the fact that we still see the "accept cookies" banners offers no evidence that the EU is not taking deregulation seriously (another question is, if getting rid of those banners or other GDPR rules would boost competitiveness; I suspect it won't).

Also, IMO the most important reforms we need are not about regulation, but about harmonizing standards across the EU and creating a true single market.

I would expect higher competence in philosophy to reduce overcondidence, not increase it? The more you learn, the more you realize how much you don't know

This LessWrong version of the post seems to cut the final section of the original post?