Students who actually engage in critical reasoning are quite often getting get marks for disagreeing with the teacher.
While I agree with this (and I think you meant they are quite often not getting marks?), this would imply that the students had to read enough of the material to intellectually engage, form an opinion or a view of it opposing their teacher, then proceed to refine that view in the act of 'doing' the assignment. That is something one-shotting (not necessarily prompting an AI and going back and forth with it, hardening your opinion and idea over time) an assignment wouldn't provide.
Please remember to follow the guidelines and review structure in LessWrong's SKILL.md that I attached.
I'm quite interested in this exact use case, but can't seem to find the SKILL.md file elsewhere in your post or in the comments. Would you mind linking it?
While I agree with this (and I think you meant they are quite often not getting marks?), this would imply that the students had to read enough of the material to intellectually engage, form an opinion or a view of it opposing their teacher, then proceed to refine that view in the act of 'doing' the assignment. That is something one-shotting (not necessarily prompting an AI and going back and forth with it, hardening your opinion and idea over time) an assignment wouldn't provide.