LESSWRONG
LW

serenus
0010
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No wikitag contributions to display.
Sunk Cost Fallacy
serenus12y00

It reminds me a bit about how Jefferson Hope went about getting his betrothed's ring back. He hired an actor to fool Holmes, to salvage what he knew he'd lost. He could (if he were a real criminal, and not a dummy for Holmes's deductions) gain more than only his ring back, if the actor also brought him valuable intelligence (or even incapacitated Holmes in some way). Would it be turning a sunk cost into a purchase, or am I mistaken?

Reply
No posts to display.