LESSWRONG
LW

1605
shelvacu
0020
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No posts to display.
No wikitag contributions to display.
Two LessWrong speed friending experiments
shelvacu1y10

I suspect the reason you found little difference in match quality is because "being interested and able to attend a LessWrong event" is already a huge filter. Maybe you already knew that.

Reply
You don't know how bad most things are nor precisely how they're bad.
shelvacu1y1-3

I'm surprised, I think I was predisposed to agree with the conclusion but this post has the opposite effect. This post seems to implicitly take as a given that
1. Pianos sounding the way the piano tuner and pianist wanted them to sound is a Good Thing, and
2. It is not replicable by machines
 

\#2 is a very unusual take for this site, perhaps I misunderstood?

\#1 Why should Piano Tuner's preferences for how a piano sounds affect my preferences? Maybe I like the variety of hearing an out-of-tune piano:

You can be a [connoisseur of anything](https://xkcd.com/915/). I think I do value connoisseurs existing, but I'm not sure I value specifically piano connoisseurs in their current form existing.

And then we'll all have slightly worse pianos than we would otherwise have.

I fundamentally disagree. Worse according to Piano Tuner, sure. But will the experiences we have of enjoying music get worse if piano tuners slowly died out as a profession? I doubt it.

Reply