This post claims: Claim-tagging is worth trying more broadly

This post claims: Explicitly tagging the core claims of a post will make people substantially more likely to respond to these claims.

This post claims: Irrelevant nitpicks are an important problem in comment sections on sites such as LessWrong.

This post claims: Comments are a high-quality, high-sensitivity measure of engagement with little in the way of viable substitutes.

This post claims: Location on the comments-links continuum is an important aspect of discourse design.

I think the saying is "clear beliefs weakly held", not "strong beliefs weakly held".

I think this claim's title is too long to be used a handle for the concept.

I need some explanatory text before I can vote on this.