In the frum community, the argument is referred to as "the Kuzari argument." I don't know the name of the fallacy, but please do lmk if you find out.
I read that .pdf multiple times 5-7 years ago, and the Kuzari argument assumes that religious people assess dogmas the way a scientist would assess a scientific claim, which, like you said, is fallacious.
In the frum community, the argument is referred to as "the Kuzari argument." I don't know the name of the fallacy, but please do lmk if you find out.
I read that .pdf multiple times 5-7 years ago, and the Kuzari argument assumes that religious people assess dogmas the way a scientist would assess a scientific claim, which, like you said, is fallacious.