LESSWRONG
LW

2749
TimL
6020
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No posts to display.
No wikitag contributions to display.
Scaling laws for dominant assurance contracts
TimL2y30

Yeah, I feel they are barking up the wrong tree. If you look at the numbers, there's not much revenue once N is much above 100. I think there's potential for some use of the work, but you still need a benefactor.

Reply
Scaling laws for dominant assurance contracts
TimL2y*50

Hi, great post. I've also noted the square-root rule and think it should be more widely known. I've also co-authored a paper showing that the dominant assurance contract described by Tabarrok does not lead to larger profit than a standard contract with the same parameters and have some other work that I'm writing up on the same thing for large N with fixed and variable payments. 

I've come up with the upper limit of μ+σ√2sqrt2π(N−1)KN for the fixed-payment, and something similar for variable payment.

Is there a lot of interest in this at the moment? I agree, it's of narrow interest, so I'm curious into why you've posted this now.

(In case you're wondering how I got here, I followed Tabarrok's recent post about EnsureDone on MarginalRevolution. I'd heard of LessWrong before then but hadn't joined).

Reply