I'm preemptively sorry if this question have already been raised, I don't feel like reading all the comments.
What am I doing now is reciting the points from Habr (a mostly-coding-oriented site where this article have been translated in Russian and criticized in comments)
The main criticism is against the key point of the article, the graphs of "edit N genes, get M bonus to IQ".
The arguments are:
I remember how anti-war was a pro-Ukrainian position. Now, to be that kind of "antiwar", you must be for military escalation to destroy Russia, call up "kill the orcs", and Russia is trying to start the negotiations.
Well, to be fair, it was like that since the beginning, and pacifism was just a shiny cover.
By the way, I'm not pro-Russian. Srsly. They don't genuinely seek, and wouldn't ever achieve denazification, even though it's very important to do.
Yes. Trying to make up a new way to redistribute the products among the whole society is pointless, if the means of production are still owned privately.
What's so bad about DPRK tho?
As someone who agrees with Stalin in, well, most of the questions (with a few exceptions, some of them are quite important, but it's not that important to explain there), what could I say?
There are newer papers on IQ and race, and a lot of critique of that one.
Ability to solve IQ tests can differ in a single person, for like 10+ points. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/study-finds-poverty-reduces-brain-power-idUSL6N0GU1PO/
My dad have scored around 170, and considers IQ tests pointless.
I agree with your point about the male-looking face.
It's pointless to pretend that LGBT+ is not an organisation with ideology. By the way, their ideology is too backwards and reactionary in relation to what do WE plan, regarding the
Thanks.
No matter the amount of gigabytes it writes per second, I'm not afraid of something that sees the world as text. +1 point to capitalism for not making something that is overly expensive to develop and may doom the world.
Take, for example, AISafety.info, that tries to explain.
"In recent years, AI has exceeded people’s expectations in a wide variety of domains — including playing Go, composing human-like text, writing code, and modeling protein folding"
Not a single current "AI" can do all of it simultaneously. All of them are neuros, who can't even learn and perform over 1 task, to say nothing of escaping the power of alt+f4.
"Advanced AI could provide great benefits, but it could also cause unprecedented disasters, and even human extinction, unless difficult technical safety problems are solved and humanity cooperates to deploy advanced AI wisely."
As if other pieces of technology weren't just as "autonomous" and dangerous.
... (read 488 more words →)"Rapid progress in the
Thanks for replying!
The link is: https://habr.com/ru/articles/933324/