Zsolt Tanko

Do you know any concrete resources, even just discussions in other settings, that address how to tangibly attempt to bridge this gap?

I've run into a similar problem to the degree that it stops projects dead - no realistic means of reaching an audience translates into low motivation, despite what I believe are nontrivial new ideas

To take an example, 4E cogsci concretely applied to the alignment/subjecthood dialog. I find myself in some (worse?) netherworld of trying to glue together an epistemic gap, where the audience capable of applying technical downstreams (ML certainly, but even alignment/safety folks) find 4E epistemics foreign and antithetical to the grammar of formalist thought, while the audience able to engage the 4E basics lacks the technical training to pursue the line of thought