Misleading conclusion. Their 400 IU dose of Vit D was pathetically low and therefore totally ineffective. However if you look at table 2, you'll see that their data show that serum vit. D level was strongly inversely linked to colorectal cancer.
Thanks for the comment! Don't hesitate to edit the page.
You can also edit your comment by hovering over it and clicking the pencil icon that appears on the left.
Lastly, liking/disliking is for measuring the quality of the Arbital page itself. To express your belief that the paper is not effective, you should cast a probability vote, which I just added to this page.
Misleading conclusion. Their 400 IU dose of Vit D was pathetically low and therefore totally ineffective. However if you look at table 2, you'll see that their data show that serum vit. D level was strongly inversely linked to colorectal cancer.
Thanks, duly noted.
Thanks for the comment! Don't hesitate to edit the page.
You can also edit your comment by hovering over it and clicking the pencil icon that appears on the left.
Lastly, liking/disliking is for measuring the quality of the Arbital page itself. To express your belief that the paper is not effective, you should cast a probability vote, which I just added to this page.