Bayes's Rule (in the odds form or proportional form) states:
Interpreting as the hypotheses under consideration, as the evidence being observed, and giving "prior odds", "likelihood ratio", and "posterior odds" their standard meanings, Bayes's Rule states:
To prove Bayes's Rule, use the definition of conditional probability:
As follows:
For a specific example, consider the problem:
20% of the patients in the screening population start out with Diseasitis. Among patients with Diseasitis, 90% turn the tongue depressor black. 30% of the patients without Diseasitis will also turn the tongue depressor black. A patient turns a tongue depressor black. Given only this information, what is the probability that they have Diseasitis?
Bayes' solves the problem by saying, "The prior odds of Diseasitis vs. health are 1 : 4, the likelihood ratio for positive results is 3 : 1 for sick vs. healthy patients, therefore the posterior odds are 3 : 4, corresponding to a probability of 3/7 that a patient with a positive test result hase Diseasitis."
This reasoning would be valid because:
The quantities corresponding to the steps above would be as follows:
Or in a visual interpretation:
As a formula for a single conditional probability with the variable having states that are mutually exclusive and exhaustive, Bayes's Theorem states:
This follows from the definition of conditional probability:
From the law of marginal probability:
And from the definition of conditional probability:
Using the Diseasitis example above, this would say:
Using the specific numbers:
Visually: