LESSWRONG
LW

Wikitags

The rationals form a field

Edited by Patrick Stevens, et al. last updated 7th Jul 2016
Requires: Algebraic field

The set Q of rational numbers is a field.

Proof

Q is a (commutative) ring with additive identity 01 (which we will write as 0 for short) and multiplicative identity 11 (which we will write as 1 for short): we check the axioms individually.

  • + is commutative: ab+cd=ad+bcbd, which by commutativity of addition and multiplication in Z is cb+dadb=cd+ab
  • 0 is an identity for +: have ab+0=ab+01=a×1+0×bb×1, which is ab because 1 is a multiplicative identity in Z and 0×n=0 for every integer n.
  • Every rational has an additive inverse: ab has additive inverse −ab.
  • + is associative: (a1b1+a2b2)+a3b3=a1b2+b1a2b1b2+a3b3=a1b2b3+b1a2b3+a3b1b2b1b2b3 which we can easily check is equal to a1b1+(a2b2+a3b3).
  • × is associative, trivially: (a1b1a2b2)a3b3=a1a2b1b2a3b3=a1a2a3b1b2b3=a1b1(a2a3b2b3)=a1b1(a2b2a3b3)
  • × is commutative, again trivially: abcd=acbd=cadb=cdab
  • 1 is an identity for ×: ab×1=ab×11=a×1b×1=ab by the fact that 1 is an identity for × in Z.
  • + distributes over ×: ab(x1y1+x2y2)=abx1y2+x2y1y1y2=a(x1y2+x2y1)by1y2 while abx1y1+abx2y2=ax1by1+ax2by2=ax1by2+by1ax2b2y1y2=ax1y2+ay1x2by1y2 so we are done by distributivity of + over × in Z.

So far we have shown that Q is a ring; to show that it is a field, we need all nonzero fractions to have inverses under multiplication. But if ab is not 0 (equivalently, a≠0), then ab has inverse ba, which does indeed exist since a≠0.

This completes the proof.

Parents:
Rational number
Discussion0
Discussion0