kurokikaze
42
30
kurokikaze has not written any posts yet.
kurokikaze has not written any posts yet.
Google have processing power backed by trained engineers, which might be important too. Google can do things like "Folding@home" on their own.
And then there's three guys spending over 500 hours to recreate the first two minutes and twenty seconds of Super Mario Land using more than 18 million Minecraft blocks.
I suspect it can be done programmatically, by wiring MC server to emulator, in less than 50 hours.
Pfft. Even magenta doesn't fit in the light spectrum. Are you terrified yet? :)
No, I'm not talking about the basis to criticize technology, but more about of actual target of criticism. Disclaimer: there sure are technologies that can do more harm than good. Here I will concentrate on communications, as you picked it as being one of the top problematic technologies.
For me, it all boils down to constructive side of criticism: should we change the technologies of the way we use them? Because I think in first case, new technologies will be used with the same drawbacks for humans as old ones. In the second case, successful usage patterns can be applied to new technologies as well.
For example, rather than limit the usage of... (read more)
Sorry, but isn't this the criticism of inappropriate use of technologies rather than technologies itself?
It will not return any specific person even if you speak Google: a person -"Genghis Khan"
Calculated from gravitational force.
I think vegetarian-carnivore metaphor here doesn't help at all :)
I mean it could not be visible from a game log (for complex games). We will see the combination of pieces when game ends (ending condition), but it can be not enough.
If your true goal is "everyone lives", then 50% blue cutoff is waaay more achievable than 100% red one.