LESSWRONG
LW

WrongBot
308376550
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No wikitag contributions to display.
What are you working on? June 2012
WrongBot11y00

Hahahaha, nope.

Reply
Open Thread, December 2-8, 2013
WrongBot12y70

I'm planning to run a rationality-friendly table-top roleplaying game over IRC and am soliciting players.

The system is Unknown Armies, a game of postmodern magic set in a creepier, weirder version of our own world. Expect to investigate crimes, decipher the methods behind occult rituals, interpret symbols, and slowly go mad. This particular game will follow the misadventures of a group of fast food employees working for an occult cabal (well, more like a mailing list) that wants to make the world a better place.

Sessions will be 3-4 hours once a week over IRC or google hangouts or skype or whatever people are most comfortable with. Slots for two-three players, email me at sburnstein@gmail.com if you're interested or if I can answer any questions about the game.

Reply
I attempted the AI Box Experiment again! (And won - Twice!)
WrongBot12y20

It may be possible to take advantage of multiple levels of reality within the game itself to confuse or trick the gatekeeper. For instance, must the experiment only be set in one world? Can there not be multiple layers of reality within the world you create? I feel that elaborating on this any further is dangerous. Think carefully about what this advice is trying to imply.

This is a pretty clever way of defeating precommitments. (Assuming I'm drawing the correct inferences.) How central was this tactic to your approach, if you're willing to comment?

Reply
Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 21, chapters 91 & 92
WrongBot12y20

The bad guy(s) relative to Harry. Hermione coming back is important whichever way his morality goes.

Reply
Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 21, chapters 91 & 92
WrongBot12y170

I'm about 95% confident Eliezer wouldn't do such a thing.

Reply
Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 21, chapters 91 & 92
WrongBot12y10

By "wins" I just meant "beats the bad guy(s)".

Reply
Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 21, chapters 91 & 92
WrongBot12y40

Quirrell is That Fucker.

Heavy spoilers for Nonjon's excellent A Black Comedy follow.

Va N Oynpx Pbzrql, Qnivq Zbaebr vf gur ragvgl perngrq jura gur Ubepehk va Evqqyr'f qvnel fhpprffshyyl erfheerpgf vgfrys, jvgu gur gjvfg gung vg jnf perngrq hfvat nyy bs Ibyqrzbeg'f 'cbfvgvir' rzbgvbaf. Guhf Qnivq Zbaebr vf bccbfrq gb Ibyqrzbeg, unf uvf zrzbevrf naq fxvyyf, naq frrf gung fgbel'f Uneel nf n cbgragvny gbby, nyyl, be rira rdhny.

Fbhaq snzvyvne? Gur anzr whfg znxrf vg boivbhf.

Reply
Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 21, chapters 91 & 92
WrongBot12y20

Hermione will be resurrected before the conclusion of this story.

(Given that Harry wins and souls aren't real.)

Reply
Public Service Announcement Collection
WrongBot12y250

PSA: There is an actual physical sensation that accompanies religious experiences. If you feel the presence of a being of awesome power and an unusual sensation of... fullness?... in your chest, don't panic or starting believing in a god or anything crazy.

It's a physiological thing that happens to people, especially in altered states (drugs, sleep deprivation, etc.), and it doesn't mean anything.

Reply
Discussion: Which futures are good enough?
WrongBot12y00

Right, but not all trade-offs are equal. Thinking-rainbows-are-pretty and self-determination are worth different amounts.

Reply
Load More
8Discussion: Which futures are good enough?
12y
50
3[LINK] Levels of Ethics
14y
6
17Forager Anthropology
15y
133
15Against the standard narrative of human sexual evolution
15y
154
15Some Thoughts Are Too Dangerous For Brains to Think
15y
318
69Unknown knowns: Why did you choose to be monogamous?
15y
669